<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trust and Letting Go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firehousezen.com/2009/02/26/trust-and-letting-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firehousezen.com/2009/02/26/trust-and-letting-go/</link>
	<description>Brain Food for Mongo. Change management &#38; leadership in today&#039;s emergency services.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:31:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddie M. Bell</title>
		<link>http://firehousezen.com/2009/02/26/trust-and-letting-go/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddie M. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firehousezen.com/?p=316#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Mick, you&#039;ve hit on a subject I believe has (in some way or form) perplexed many leaders and managers. Stepping away from other leadership roles can be daunting. It&#039;s very easy to &quot;jump in&quot; and get involved in the minute details of an incident; hopefully, the more complex, overarching responsibilities as the incident commander do not suffer as a result.

Personally, I believe having an understanding (in your case, special ops) of the intracacies (sp?) of the emergency can be a great asset. For example, special operations incidents may require more in depth incident action planning, resources, and time for a succesful resolution. With a special ops background, some errors with the action plan might be avoided. I&#039;ve often suggested if an IC doesn&#039;t have good knowledge of a problem, to find someone that does and get him/her into the CP as technical resource.

Also, my experience as an incident commander seemed to be constrained by my personal limitations. As an example, I tended to not establish an operations officer as early as I could have. Another personal limitation was not allowing the ops officer to perform his/her role without me occasionally barging in. I erred by not remembering that strategy is determined by the IC and tactics are generally determined by the ops chief.

At times, I believed this shortfall was brought about because of the lack of opportunities to utilize a larger command/general staff. I mean, 98% of incidents may require only 2-3 ICS positions be filled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick, you&#8217;ve hit on a subject I believe has (in some way or form) perplexed many leaders and managers. Stepping away from other leadership roles can be daunting. It&#8217;s very easy to &#8220;jump in&#8221; and get involved in the minute details of an incident; hopefully, the more complex, overarching responsibilities as the incident commander do not suffer as a result.</p>
<p>Personally, I believe having an understanding (in your case, special ops) of the intracacies (sp?) of the emergency can be a great asset. For example, special operations incidents may require more in depth incident action planning, resources, and time for a succesful resolution. With a special ops background, some errors with the action plan might be avoided. I&#8217;ve often suggested if an IC doesn&#8217;t have good knowledge of a problem, to find someone that does and get him/her into the CP as technical resource.</p>
<p>Also, my experience as an incident commander seemed to be constrained by my personal limitations. As an example, I tended to not establish an operations officer as early as I could have. Another personal limitation was not allowing the ops officer to perform his/her role without me occasionally barging in. I erred by not remembering that strategy is determined by the IC and tactics are generally determined by the ops chief.</p>
<p>At times, I believed this shortfall was brought about because of the lack of opportunities to utilize a larger command/general staff. I mean, 98% of incidents may require only 2-3 ICS positions be filled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian P. Mayers, CFPS, CFEI</title>
		<link>http://firehousezen.com/2009/02/26/trust-and-letting-go/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian P. Mayers, CFPS, CFEI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firehousezen.com/?p=316#comment-139</guid>
		<description>The difference between being responsible FOR them, and being responsible TO them.  Kids or firefighters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between being responsible FOR them, and being responsible TO them.  Kids or firefighters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

